The National Park Service is considering a steep increase in entrance fees at 17 of its most popular parks, mostly in the American west, to address a backlog of maintenance and infrastructure projects.
Visitors to the Grand Canyon, Yosemite, Yellowstone, Zion and other national parks would be charged $70 per vehicle, up from the fee of $30 for a weekly pass. At other parks, the price hike is nearly triple, from $25 to $70.
A 30-day public comment period opened Tuesday. The Park Service says it expects to raise $70m a year with the proposal at a time when national parks have been repeatedly breaking visitation records and putting a strain on park resources. Nearly 6 million people visited the Grand Canyon last year.
“We need to have a vision to look at the future of our parks and take action in order to ensure that our grandkids’ grandkids will have the same if not better experience than we have today,” the interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, said in a statement. “Shoring up our parks’ aging infrastructure will do that.”
Annual $80 passes for federal lands would not change, though fees would go up for pedestrians and motorcyclists. The higher fees would apply only during the five busiest contiguous months for parks. For most, those months are May through September, when many families are on vacation.
The proposal would not affect several free weekends and holidays at parks throughout the year.
It comes not long after many of the parks that charge entrance fees raised them. The rationale is the same this time around – to address a backlog of maintenance and infrastructure projects.
The Park Service estimated deferred maintenance across its parks cost $11.3bn as of September 2016, down from $11.9bn in 2015.
Kevin Dahl, Arizona senior program manager for the National Parks Conservation Association, said maintenance costs should fall to Congress, not visitors.
“We’ve supported increases at the parks. They are a huge value for the price of entrance,” he said. “But we want to look closely at this and we want local communities to look closely at this to see if it would impact visitation because we don’t want to price people out of the parks.”
Jose Gonzalez, founder of Latino Outdoors, said the need for revenue and to control the crowds at the busiest parks was understandable but he questioned the potential impact.
“If there isn’t always a question or consideration of equitable access to a lot of communities, it’s only going to increase the disparity in terms of who is able to access our national parks and public lands,” he said.
Not all Park Service sites charge entrance fees. The 118 that do keep 80% of revenue for things like fixing restrooms, signs, trails, exhibits and campgrounds and send 20% into a pot to help other free park sites.
Erik and Janet Schwartz of Boston said regular maintenance was vital for enjoying national parks. The couple was wrapping up a four-week trip that included visits to Bryce, Zion and the Grand Canyon.
The entrance fees were a bargain considering the vastness of the parks, they said, but they also wanted assurance the revenue was used as intended.
“If they have the true justification for that, then I think preserving these lands for future generations is absolutely critical,” Erik Schwartz said.
A Flagstaff, Arizona, resident, Brittany Montague, said the proposed increase was “completely unreasonable”, especially for young families and those making a day trip to national parks. If the cost included a guided tour or family photo, “it might make it worth it”, she said.
The proposal applies to Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonlands and Zion in Utah; Yosemite, Sequoia & Kings Canyon and Joshua Tree in California; Grand Teton and Yellowstone in Wyoming; Mount Rainier and Olympic in Washington; Shenandoah in Virginia; Acadia in Maine; Rocky Mountain in Colorado; the Grand Canyon in Arizona; and Denali in Alaska.
Denali’s price plan is structured differently because it is largely a drive-through park. The vehicle fee doesn’t apply. The proposed increase per person is from $10 to $30.